Indonesia: Politics Without Opposition

 


The majority of Indonesia’s population is Javanese — estimated at nearly 80 percent. This immense demographic weight means that Javanese cultural psychology has profoundly shaped Indonesia’s political psychology, even to this day.

The roots of this influence stretch back more than a millennium. Since the 8th century, Java has been home to powerful classical kingdoms: Mataram Hindu (aka Medang), Janggala, Panjalu, Singhasari, Majapahit, Demak, Pajang, and later the Islamic Mataram dynasty that endured into the 18th and 20th centuries. Long before the modern Indonesian state was born, these kingdoms established traditions of power, unity, and governance that continue to echo in the nation’s political life.

Javanese political psychology, which deeply values oneness and the appearance of harmony, creates a cultural environment where formal, Western-style "opposition" is often viewed as a sign of weakness and disorder rather than a healthy democratic function.

Here is how Javanese psychology influences the lack of a traditional political opposition here:

1. The Obsessive Concern with "One-ness" (Manunggal)

Traditional Javanese political thought is characterized by an "obsessive concern with one-ness". Power is seen as a concrete, constant energy that is strongest when it is concentrated in a single center.

  • Multiplicity as Weakness: Factionalism, multi-party systems, and the constitutional separation of powers (such as the formal divisions between an opposition and the government) are traditionally interpreted not as "checks and balances," but as signs of the diffusion and ebbing of Power.

  • Psychological Malaise: The multi-party parliamentary democracy of the 1950s caused a "psychological malaise" among Javanese because the parties were seen as unsuccessful in cooperating toward a single center of gravity.

2. The "Absorptive" Nature of the Center

Instead of allowing a formal opposition to exist outside the government, the logic of Javanese Power requires a center that is syncretic and absorptive.

  • Co-option over Confrontation: Rather than destroying an adversary, the preferred method of dealing with a rival is absorption or co-option. By bringing different and even hostile groups into the center (such as through a "National Council" or large coalitions), a leader demonstrates their ability to "contain opposites" and concentrate Power.

  • Legitimacy through Unity: A leader's legitimacy is tied to their ability to personify the unity of society. To have an "opposition" would be to admit that this unity is broken.

3. Rukun and the Avoidance of Direct Conflict

The social value of rukun—the maintenance of the appearance of harmony and unanimity—makes open political opposition distasteful.

  • Preference for Rembug (Deliberation): Conflicts are ideally settled through extended deliberation (rembug) where all sides "give way a little" to reach a unanimous agreement, avoiding a scenario where there is a clear winner and a clear loser.

  • Suppression of Self-Interest: The cultural rejection of pamrih (selfish personal motives) means that those who oppose the center are often labeled as acting out of hidden self-interest rather than for the greater good.

4. Satru and Covert Disobedience

When political conflicts cannot be resolved through absorption, they rarely manifest as open, formal debate. Instead, they follow the psychological patterns:

  • Covert Disobedience: Because it is "distasteful to a Javanese to oppose directly the will of another person," disagreements often result in evasion or covert disobedience.

  • Mutual Avoidance (Satru): The cultural mechanism for handling deep-seated hostility is often satru—a long-term pattern of not speaking to or interacting with an opponent. In a political context, this manifests as groups simply withdrawing or avoiding cooperation rather than engaging in a formal "loyal opposition".

In summary, the sources indicate that the Javanese "Idea of Power" views the existence of a formal opposition as a looseness or diffusion of Power within the state, which historically drives Indonesian political leaders toward models of consensus and absorption rather than competitive confrontation.

Javanese cultural psychology has had a strong influence on the older generations up to the baby boomers. But for Millennials, Gen Z, and the generations to come, will they still be deeply shaped by the same psychology, or will they be bolder in adopting a more egalitarian and pragmatic political style? Time will tell.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUNYI DI TENGAH REPUBLIK

Jejak Imlek di Benteng Heritage

BUMN, Pekerjaan, dan ROI Kekuasaan